Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
31/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
454 GS FLX whole-genome sequencing of Escherichia coli producing 55 million bases from 218k longer reads with mixed quality (93.2% Q20, 23.3% Q30). This long-read WGS dataset may be valuable for resolving repetitive regions and structural variants but requires careful quality trimming and validation, particularly given the low Q30 percentage typical of this platform.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0