Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq of the sweat bee Megalopta genalis, yielding 1.9 billion bases with high quality (97.7% Q20, 94.6% Q30, 41.5% GC) across 9.7 million short reads. This transcriptomic resource supports functional studies of circadian biology, visual processing, and behavior in a nocturnal bee, providing robust coverage for gene-expression profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0