SRR2080489

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq from ant (Formica exsecta, A grade, 96/100). Q30 bases (88.3%) scores 92/100 and mean base quality (34.9) scores 100/100 (both measured), indicating excellent base reliability. Low duplication (18.57%) reflects good sequencing efficiency. Suitable for reliable expression quantification.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Formica exsecta

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 7414915860 reported

total reads 37449070 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 94.5 measured

pct q30 bases 88.3 measured

gc content pct 37.6 measured

mean read length 99 measured

mean base quality 34.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.16 measured

duplication rate pct 18.57 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 88.3 measured ×1 92%

mean base quality 34.9 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.16 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 18.57 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0