Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq of the stick insect Clitarchus hookeri, generating 539 million bases with high quality (98.4% Q20, 95.5% Q30, 45.1% GC) across 10.7 million short reads. This dataset enables expression profiling in an arthropod model for developmental and evolutionary studies, with quality metrics suitable for robust transcript quantification.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0