Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR21205381

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Wastewater metagenome amplicon profiling on MiSeq with 2.51 million 149 bp reads at 95% Q20 and 94% Q30 enables species identification in environmental samples. The 39.9% GC is consistent with bacterial communities; suitable for 16S rRNA or ITS amplicon sequencing to characterize microbial composition and track pathogens in wastewater surveillance.

Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
wastewater metagenome
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 748201116 reported
total reads 2510742 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 95 measured
pct q30 bases 94 measured
gc content pct 39.9 measured
mean read length 149 measured
mean base quality 36.5 measured
adapter content pct 3.27 measured
duplication rate pct 95.78 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94 measured ×1 100%
adapter content pct 3.27 measured ×0.5 84%
QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 75