Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq of the parasitoid wasp Lysiphlebus fabarum, yielding 941 million bases across 9.3 million short reads with moderate quality (91.5% Q20, 86.4% Q30, 43.4% GC). This transcriptomic resource supports functional studies of parasitoid behavior, reproduction, and host-parasite interactions, though the moderate quality may limit detection of low-abundance transcripts.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0