Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq of Bemisia tabaci, producing 6.5 billion bases with high quality (97.7% Q20, 93.5% Q30, 44.3% GC) across 32.3 million short reads. This dataset enables comprehensive expression analysis in the whitefly vector, supporting research on vector competence, host adaptation, and mechanisms of plant-virus interaction.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0