Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing (Staphylococcus epidermidis, 454 GS FLX Titanium platform). Grade C, platform and Q30 constraints present. Q30 of 79.7% is the critical limitation (48/100 score)—below standards for variant accuracy. The 454 platform produces longer reads (320.5 bp) but compromised base quality makes variant reuse risky. All metrics measured.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0