Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
46/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human whole exome capture (WXS) from Illumina HiSeq 2000 targeting coding regions at 798M total bases with 47.1% GC and 80.4% Q30 — a threshold where base-calling accuracy begins to degrade. Moderate read depth and Q-score limit sensitivity for rare variants and poor-quality region recovery; reuse requires careful quality filtering. Best for large population surveys of rare coding mutations rather than clinical-grade variant interpretation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0