Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
D. melanogaster WGS from Genome Analyzer IIx with 5.8B bases and 41.5× coverage but notably lower quality (73.8% Q30) than other IIx runs, suggesting end-run or chemistry drift. The reduced accuracy is acceptable for population-level variant detection and small indel discovery but compromises fine-scale structural analysis. Pair with higher-quality D. melanogaster datasets for robust variant consensus.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0