SRR248127

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

71/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read WGS from Drosophila melanogaster (C grade, 71/100, evidence_strength=0.61). Q30 bases (73.8%) scores only 19/100 (measured), limiting variant-calling confidence. The mean coverage (28.5x) is extrapolated rather than measured, so this provisional reading requires a deep measured pass before confident reuse for variant discovery.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3994328152 reported

total reads 13679206 reported

mean coverage 28.5 extrapolated

n content pct 0.041 measured

pct q20 bases 84 measured

pct q30 bases 73.8 measured

gc content pct 41.9 measured

mean read length 146 measured

mean base quality 30.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.74 measured

duplication rate pct 0.82 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 71/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 28.5 extrapolated ×1.2 93%

pct q30 bases 73.8 measured ×1 19%

duplication rate pct 0.82 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.74 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 45 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0