Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read WGS of Drosophila melanogaster with marginal base quality. Grade C reflects Q30 of 74.2% (scored lowest at 21/100), which is below the threshold for confident variant calling; this metric is critical for diploid SNP accuracy. The provisional evidence_strength (0.61) stems from extrapolated coverage (33×), so a deep measured revalidation is pending before committing to reuse.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0