Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Drosophila melanogaster on an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx generates ~16.7 million reads at moderate base quality (84.2% ≥Q20, 73.4% ≥Q30) with estimated 34.7× mean coverage, enabling deep genome sequencing of this model organism for variant discovery and structural analysis. The older platform and moderate per-base quality require careful post-processing. Reuse for population genetics and mutagenesis screening is well-supported.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0