Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Bacillus cereus on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 yields ~1.6 million reads at exceptional base quality (99.7% ≥Q20, 98.4% ≥Q30), enabling high-confidence genome assembly. The modest read count reflects shallow sequencing. Reuse for virulence gene identification and typing is suitable.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0