Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Acinetobacter baumannii on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 yields ~2 million reads at moderate base quality (94.5% ≥Q20, 85.4% ≥Q30), enabling genome assembly of this multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogen for surveillance and infection control studies. The lower coverage and quality compared to other A. baumannii datasets may limit resolution of complex structural variants. Reuse requires careful quality assessment.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0