Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Acinetobacter pittii whole genome amplified (WGA) and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 2000, generating ~2B short reads with 40.9% GC and 88% Q30 bases. WGA introduces amplification bias and strand-specific artifacts, so this is best suited for large-scale structural variants and population surveys rather than fine-scale variant calling. Search for WGA bacterial genomes, Acinetobacter genomics, or HiSeq-era prokaryotic WGS.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0