Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
85/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome amplicon sequencing of Acinetobacter baumannii on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 generates ~4.7 million reads at good base quality (96.7% ≥Q20), enabling complete genome assembly of this opportunistic pathogen for detection of antibiotic resistance determinants and virulence factors. The 40.9% GC content is typical. Reuse for epidemiological tracking and resistance gene identification is well-supported.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0