SRR2558852

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

59/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Acinetobacter baumannii

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 877626768 reported

total reads 1891437 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 86.8 measured

pct q30 bases 83.6 measured

gc content pct 41.8 measured

mean read length 229 measured

mean base quality 33.2 measured

adapter content pct 38.57 measured

duplication rate pct 11.45 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 59/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.6 measured ×1 68%

duplication rate pct 11.45 measured ×0.5 89%

adapter content pct 38.57 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0