SRR2558914

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

75/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Acinetobacter pittii WGA on HiSeq 2000 with 3.5B bases and 84.7% Q30, offering moderate-to-good coverage for resistance profiling and genomic epidemiology in this opportunistic pathogen. WGA artifacts require caution for indel and structural variant analysis.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Acinetobacter pittii

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3586997628 reported

total reads 17757414 reported

n content pct 0.025 measured

pct q20 bases 92.2 measured

pct q30 bases 84.7 measured

gc content pct 40.8 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 33.6 measured

adapter content pct 3.13 measured

duplication rate pct 16.97 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 75/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.7 measured ×1 74%

duplication rate pct 16.97 measured ×0.5 72%

adapter content pct 3.13 measured ×0.4 85%

QC cost 34 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0