Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human gut metagenome (WGS) on MiSeq with modest depth (340M bases, 685K very long reads from MiSeq chemistry) and 93.3% Q30, suitable for metagenomic assembly and taxonomic profiling of bacterial populations. The few, long reads are valuable for resolving operons and small plasmids; search for microbiome sequencing, 16S-independent metagenomic methods, or microbial ecology.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0