Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Dendrolimus punctatus (pine caterpillar) bulk RNA-seq from HiSeq 2000 with exceptional depth (10.7B bases, 53.8M reads) and 93.1% Q30, rivaling a small genome project. This high-quality, high-depth transcriptome is excellent for gene annotation, isoform discovery, and pest-specific expression profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0