Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
48/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Shallow whole-genome sequencing of Homo sapiens on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 generates approximately 1.2× mean coverage with high base quality (95.9% ≥Q20), sufficient for detection of common variants and population-level allele frequency estimation. This dataset is most suitable for large-scale population studies or imputation reference panels. Deep sequencing or targeted approaches are needed for clinical variant reporting and heterozygous variant detection.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0