Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S/18S amplicon sequencing of chicken gut metagenome on an Illumina MiSeq generates ~34,000 reads at high base quality (97.1% ≥Q20, 90.6% ≥Q30), enabling microbial community profiling and taxonomic assignment in poultry gut samples. The modest read count is typical for amplicon surveys and adequate for assessing dominant taxa. Reuse for alpha and beta diversity analysis requires normalized read depths.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0