Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
58/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome amplicon sequencing of human gut metagenome on an Illumina MiSeq generates ~4.7 million reads spanning 2.68 billion bases at moderate base quality (89.4% ≥Q20), enabling microbial community profiling and taxonomic assignment of dominant bacterial taxa. The format suggests targeted gene amplicon sequencing rather than shotgun metagenomics. Reuse for quantitative microbial ecology requires careful primer bias assessment.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0