Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bemisia tabaci whitefly RNA-seq on HiSeq 2000 (7M reads, 345M bases) with perfect quality (100% Q20 and Q30 bases, 45.3% GC). The exceptional accuracy across all reads makes this a premium resource for variant calling, isoform discovery, and sensitive detection of lowly expressed whitefly-specific genes despite modest sequencing depth.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0