Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bemisia tabaci whitefly RNA-seq on HiSeq 2000 (7.9M reads, 387M bases) with perfect quality (100% Q20 and Q30, 44.1% GC). The flawless base accuracy supports confident variant discovery and isoform reconstruction in this agricultural pest whitefly, enabling identification of xenobiotic metabolism and insecticide-resistance genes.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0