Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
45/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA sequencing of Tribolium castaneum using the Illumina Genome Analyzer II platform yields ~41 million reads with moderate base quality (78.8% ≥Q20), characteristic of earlier-generation sequencing technology and suitable for abundance-based transcriptome profiling in this classic model beetle. The dataset supports gene discovery and comparative analysis across insects. Quality thresholds are lower than modern instruments, requiring careful filtering for sensitive downstream analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0