Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Osmia bicornis mason bee RNA-seq via HiSeq 2000 (27.7M reads, 5.59B bases, 97.9% Q20, 94.3% Q30). The combination of high sequencing depth, excellent quality, and 40.2% GC composition provides comprehensive transcriptome coverage for studying solitary bee physiology and comparing gene regulatory networks with social Apis species.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0