Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Tribolium castaneum RNA-seq on Ion Torrent Proton (7.6M reads, 960M bases, Q20 70.9%, Q30 1.7%, 45.6% GC) showing Ion platform-characteristic lower quality scores but adequate for transcript mapping. The dataset enables gene expression profiling when accounting for platform-specific homopolymer errors.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0