Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq of Tribolium castaneum on an Ion Torrent Proton yields ~8.5 million reads at low-to-moderate base quality (70.1% ≥Q20), suitable for transcript abundance quantification and abundance-based differential expression when strict base quality filtering is applied. The platform's performance is limited for low-abundance targets or variant-level analysis. Reuse is most appropriate for validation of Illumina-derived findings.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0