Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Tribolium castaneum RNA-seq on Ion Torrent Proton (8.2M reads, 1.03B bases, Q20 69.2%, Q30 1.5%, 45.8% GC) with Ion-characteristic lower base quality but usable for transcript abundance estimation. The homopolymer-rich error pattern requires specialized bioinformatics pipelines for reliable variant calling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0