SRR292250

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 8549372200 reported

total reads 85493722 reported

n content pct 0.487 measured

pct q20 bases 88.4 measured

pct q30 bases 83.9 measured

gc content pct 49.9 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 33 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 1.61 measured

mean target coverage 137.9 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 137.9 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 83.9 measured ×1 70%

duplication rate pct 1.61 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0