SRR2960053

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

88/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read WGS from bacterial strain (Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis) achieving B-grade with 88/100 score. Moderate duplication (17.57%, scored 70/100) and minor adapter content (3.57%, scored 82/100) are the limiting metrics, while Q30 bases (91.1%) remain acceptable. Suitable for whole-genome assembly with awareness of moderate duplication.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1319437094 reported

total reads 4368997 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 94.1 measured

pct q30 bases 91.1 measured

gc content pct 55 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 33.9 measured

adapter content pct 3.57 measured

duplication rate pct 17.57 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 88/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.1 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 17.57 measured ×0.5 70%

adapter content pct 3.57 measured ×0.4 82%

QC cost 36 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0