SRR2960159

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

82/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

NextSeq 500 whole-genome sequencing of Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis yielding 300 bp reads with solid quality (94.3% Q20, 91.4% Q30) from 7 million reads, adequate for bacterial genome assembly and clinical-strain genomics.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2127029790 reported

total reads 7043145 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 94.3 measured

pct q30 bases 91.4 measured

gc content pct 55 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 34 measured

adapter content pct 3.67 measured

duplication rate pct 24.5 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 82/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91.4 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 24.5 measured ×0.5 48%

adapter content pct 3.67 measured ×0.4 81%

QC cost 56 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0