Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
82/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq of Gallus gallus on an ABI 5500xl SOLiD platform produces ~32 million reads with moderate base quality (90.5% ≥Q20) using the platform's distinct two-base encoding chemistry, offering an orthogonal perspective on avian transcriptomics. The reported 0% GC content is implausible and suggests metadata artifact requiring independent verification. SOLiD's read length and error profile differ from Illumina, requiring platform-specific QC.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0