Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Apis mellifera honey bee RNA-seq on HiSeq 2500 (19.8M reads, 97.2% Q20, 92.5% Q30) with high sequencing accuracy and 42.2% GC. The robust dataset supports expression profiling of immune and behavioral genes, differential expression analysis across castes or colonies, and characterization of hymenopteran-specific transcriptomes.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0