Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Apis mellifera honey bee RNA-seq via HiSeq 2500 (23.7M reads, 4.78B bases, 96.6% Q20, 90.9% Q30, 47.6% GC). The substantial read depth combined with moderate-to-good quality supports comprehensive gene expression profiling, identification of novel transcripts, and isoform-level analysis for studying bee health, behavior, and colony dynamics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0