Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup whole-genome short-read sequencing on HiSeq 2500 (1.2M reads, 230M bases, 99.9% Q20, 99.1% Q30). The near-perfect base quality enables accurate SNP calling but the shallow depth (~3-4× coverage assuming ~5 Mb genome) limits structural variant detection and requires careful assembly strategies.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0