Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Salmonella enterica serovar Bareilly WGS on HiSeq 2500 (1.64M reads, 321M bases, 98.1% Q20, 90.6% Q30, 50.7% GC) with 4-5× estimated coverage and good base quality. Sufficient for SNP typing and detection of common resistance alleles in surveillance applications, though low depth limits comprehensive structural variant discovery.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0