Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup WGS on HiSeq 2500 with 736K reads (138M bases, 97.9% Q20, 50.5% GC) providing very low sequencing depth. This shallow coverage is suitable only for confirmation of known variants or SNPs in highly conserved genes, with insufficient depth for de novo assembly or comprehensive variant discovery.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0