Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
miRNA sequencing of Apis mellifera on an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx generates ~9.6 million reads at excellent base quality (99% ≥Q20), enabling profiling of microRNA expression across developmental stages and castes in this model social insect and important pollinator. The read depth is suitable for quantifying moderately abundant miRNAs. Reuse for novel miRNA discovery may be constrained by modest read count.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0