Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read WGS from PacBio (E. coli, F grade, 47/100). Q30 bases (25.8%) scores zero, and mean base quality (22) indicates weak consensus—even for raw long reads these measured metrics signal sequencing or instrument issues that undermine assembly quality. The zero duplication and adapters are expected for long reads but do not offset the poor quality. Reuse requires validation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0