Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3111594

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

75/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (32bp, NextSeq 500, human). Grade C (75/100): limited utility due to duplication and marginal base quality. Duplication rate of 53.78% and mean base quality 31.6 combine to reduce effective coverage to ~46% of nominal depth.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 161981440 reported
total reads 2530960 reported
n content pct 7.655 measured
pct q20 bases 89 measured
pct q30 bases 87.2 measured
gc content pct 43.9 measured
mean read length 32 measured
mean base quality 31.6 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 53.78 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 75/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 87.2 measured ×1 86%
mean base quality 31.6 measured ×0.6 60%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 53.78 measured ×0.4 47%
QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 78