Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3111597

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

93/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (NextSeq 500, human). A-grade (93/100) premium dataset. Q30 bases of 90.8% is near-maximal and mean base quality of 32.4 is excellent (scored 73/100), both with high weight. Well-controlled duplication rate of 27.6% ensures reliability. Ideal for sensitive applications including fusion detection and cross-study meta-analysis.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 205435776 reported
total reads 3209934 reported
n content pct 7.642 measured
pct q20 bases 91.2 measured
pct q30 bases 90.8 measured
gc content pct 40.7 measured
mean read length 32 measured
mean base quality 32.4 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 27.6 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 93/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 90.8 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 32.4 measured ×0.6 73%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 27.6 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 78