Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR3111617

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

92/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq (32bp, NextSeq 500, human). Grade A (92/100): high-quality run with strong Q30 (89.9%) and reasonable base quality (32.2). The excellent Q30 combined with controlled duplication (29.2%) supports confident base calling across the read length.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
NextSeq 500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 516339264 reported
total reads 8067801 reported
n content pct 7.742 measured
pct q20 bases 90.6 measured
pct q30 bases 89.9 measured
gc content pct 43.7 measured
mean read length 32 measured
mean base quality 32.2 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 29.22 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 92/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.9 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 32.2 measured ×0.6 70%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 29.22 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 78