Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-Seq of Callosobruchus maculatus on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 yields ~6.5 million reads at exceptional base quality (99.2% ≥Q20, 97% ≥Q30), providing high-confidence transcriptome data for the pulse beetle suitable for comparative analysis and differential expression studies. The sequence quality supports precise abundance quantification. Reuse in combination with additional replicates and proper experimental design is recommended.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0