Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
40/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read RNA-seq of Apis mellifera on the HiSeq 2500 generates 16 million reads with moderate quality (90.6% Q20, 62.4% Q30), providing solid transcript abundance estimates for honeybee gene expression studies across castes or developmental stages. The dataset supports comparative genomics in this social insect model. Q30 below 70% suggests lower confidence bases; conservative filtering recommended before variant calling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0