Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
38/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Apis mellifera honey bee RNA-seq on HiSeq 2500 (17.6M reads, Q20 89.9%, Q30 59.9%, 42.6% GC) with moderate quality typical of longer-read HiSeq 2500 chemistry. Suitable for studying division of labor, stress responses, and social behavior-associated transcriptome changes in this model social insect.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0