Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq of Lasius niger with 14.4 million high-quality reads (97.1% Q20, 94.6% Q30, 43.5% GC) spanning 2.9 billion bases. Robust for expression profiling and SNP discovery in this model social insect. Biological replication and experimental condition not specified.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0