Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA sequencing of Lasius niger on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 generates ~2.6 billion bases with strong base quality (97.6% ≥Q20) and >12 million reads, supporting comprehensive transcriptome assembly and differential expression analysis for this fungus-farming ant. This dataset is well-suited for characterizing caste-specific or behavioral state-dependent transcriptional programs. Strand information and isoform-level resolution are limited by the short-read format.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0